|
|
|
EMPLOYMENT LAW BULLETIN Vol. 02, No. 06 Courtesy of Eskridge Law, Attorneys at Law The topic of this month's bulletin is retaliation. Juries do not like employers who retaliate, and often huge verdicts result when a jury finds that an employer has retaliated against an employee. A retaliation action is very serious, as it can include not only compensatory damages, but also damages for emotional distress and even punitive damages. Retaliation can consist of many things, but a retaliation claim against an employer can surface when an employee files a complaint with a government agency or when an employee complains internally of discrimination, harassment or some other violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the Labor Code, or some other employment law. In turn, then, an employer responds with some adverse action against that employee, such as a demotion, a cut in pay, a transfer or termination. For example, if an employee complains that wages or commissions that he has not yet been paid are owed to him, and then you shortly thereafter either terminate the employee or take some other type of adverse employment action against him, this could constitute retaliation by the employer and could therefore be actionable. Whether it actually does constitute retaliation depends on the employer's motive. An employer would likely argue that the adverse action against the employee would have taken place anyway, regardless of the employee's complaint for unpaid wages or commissions. However, a jury looks to many factors to determine an employer's motive. Below is a list of some of those factors. Proper Documentation Be Consistent With Your Employees Timing Is Important Eskridge Law, Attorneys at Law, may be contacted by phone (310/792-7021), by fax (310/792-7022) or by e-mail (geskridge@ealaw.net). Please visit our web site at ealaw.net or employmentattorneys.net.
|
||||||||||||||||